Strong solar aspects were found to be present at these moments. Gold is the Sun-metal, which is the reason why one might expect such. Claims that gold had been made, on these famous occasions, stirred up great public excitement. We have limited this inquiry to such occasions as were witnessed, that is to say, on which the alchemist was not alone: these are witnessed and dated alchemical moments.
By this approach we may hope to avoid the futile question of whether the alchemists 'really' made gold. The times when such events were recorded could well have in common some special qualities: for example, if lead was traditionally the prima materia from which the gold was made, would one expect strong aspects to Saturn? Or, would Mercury play a key role on days when the 'Hermetic Art' was being consummated?
Altogether nine such moments were collected
1. drawn from: 'The Gold Makers' by K.Doberer(1948), 'The Secret Tradition in alchemy' by A.E.Waite (19 ), 'Alchemy' by E.J.Holmyard (1957), 'Alchemists and Gold' by Jacques Sadoul (1972), and 'The Arts of the Alchemists' by C.A.Burland (19**)
2. The date for Edward Kelly comes from the diaries of John Dee
3. while those for Hevelius and the Guildford alchemist Dr James Price appear in their own publications
4. Where more than one such date was available, as for the alchemists Seton and Price, only the first was used.
'...I made projection of the Red Stone upon half a pound of mercury, ... the five-and-twentieth day of April following, the same year [1382] about five o'clock in the evening; which I transmuted truly into about the same quantity of pure gold, most certainly better than ordinary gold, being more soft and more pliable...I had indeed enough when I had once done it, but I found exceeding great pleasure and delight in seeing and contemplating the admirable works of Nature.' (Holmyard, p.245)
The chart of that time shows the the golden Sun conjunct Mercury within a 5ø orb, and leaden Saturn (to 6ø), themselves 1ø apart. Pluto, the 'lord of transformation' conjoins Mercury to 8'. The red planet Mars casts a trine to this four-planet stellium.
Dee's diary for 1586 tersely records some stages of the Work: 'March 24th, Mr K. put the glass in dung.... Dec 13th, Mr E.K. gave me the water, erth and all.' Then, on 19th December 'novi kalendarii', meaning the Gregorian calendar, at Trebona, in the castle of Count Rosenburg, 'E.K. made projection with his powder in the proportion of one minim upon an ounce and a quarter of mercury and produced nearly an ounce and a quarter of best gold; which gold we afterwards distributed from the crucible' (5).
On that day the Sun conjoined Mercury (2ø), trined Saturn (1ø) and squared Mars (4ø). Dee was undergoing his second Saturn-return, (5ø) synchronous with an exact fifth Jupiter return («ø). His Saturn therefore received the trine of transiting Sun (3ø) and transiting Mercury (1ø) on that day, while his North lunar Node was conjoined by them.
Dr Dee remained ignorant of how the process had been achieved, until the 10th of May 1588, when his diary states: 'E.K. did open the Great Secret to me, God be thanked.' On that day the Sun exactly conjoined Saturn, and Mars (1ø), while the Moon was Full. It seems an appropriate day for Dee's insight, whatever that was.
To Dyer, Kelley later wrote, recalling 'what delight we took together, when from the Metall simply calcined into powder after the usuall manner, distilling the Liquor so prepared with the same, we converted appropriat bodies (as our Astronomie inferiour teacheth) into Mercury, their first matter.' Where do we find a modern chemist recollecting the delight he took in a chemical operation?('The Private Diary of Mr John Dee', p.22-3)
That day saw a grand trine of Sun, Pluto and Neptune, with Saturn conjunct the North Node in trine to Jupiter. Burland p.?
A remarkable pattern built up in the heavens over May of 1782. The climax of Price's experiments came on 25 May, as a close Jupiter/Saturn conjunction opposed a close Mars/Uranus conjunction (SA OPP UR 2ø), an image of cosmic tension, while Sun-conjunct-Mercury completed a grand trine with Neptune and Pluto. When the experiments started on 6 May Mars was still 9ø from Uranus and the Sun stood in no particular aspect. The main thing of note at the start was Uranus' close opposition to Jupiter/ Saturn. Following the demonstration before Lords Onslow and Palmerston, a last trial took place on Tuesday 28 May. The fourfold opposition was still present as was the solar grand trine, but in addition the Moon came into conjunction with Jupiter/Saturn, enhancing that already tense opposition. King George was presented with gold from that experiment, and 'was pleased to express his approbation' (7).
Year Date Alchemist Metal Place 1) 1382 Apr 25 5pm N.Flamel Hg Paris 2) 1586 Dec 19 NS Kelly Hg Bohemia 3) 1602 Mar 13 4pm NS A.Seton Pb Amsterdam 4) 1648 Jan 15 Richthausen Hg Prague 5) 1667 Jan 19 10am Helvetius Pb The Hague 6) 1701 Oct 1 8pm Böttger Ag Germany 7) 1709 Feb 16 Evg Lascaris Hg Germany 8) 1716 Dec 31 - Pb Rhineland 9) 1782 May 25 J. Price Hg Guildford
Sun 22, Mercury 20, Pluto 20, Saturn 19,
Mars 16, Uranus 14, Neptune 14,
Jupiter 13, Venus 7, Moon 7
This Table scores three major aspects (conjunctions, oppositions and trines), to 5ø of orb, received by each planet, as present in the nine 'goldmaking' charts. The chance-expected score is here 9.0.The planets are here arranged in sequence, from the Sun which had the greatest number of aspects to the Moon with least. For a given planet, it happens that by chance one would expect only nine such major aspects within the group (8,9), ie one per chart. Thus the last three planets, Jupiter, Venus and the Moon, have only scored around chance level. It thereby appears that, overall, there was a huge excess of these aspects in the goldmaking charts: 76 as compared to 45 expected, a seventy percent excess. This is highly unlikely to arise by chance. It is therefore evident that, overall, these charts had very strong major aspects.
In addition, more aspects were present to the Sun than to any other of the 'planets'. Sol was receiving well over twice as many aspects than expected, in fact an excess of 150%! There is a powerful contrast between the Sun at top of the list and the Moon at the bottom, as if Luna's sensitive and reflective nature were positively unhelpful on such occasions. The two femimine planets Venus and Luna are conjointly at the bottom of the planetary-frequency list.
Pluto is associated by astrologers with atomic transmutation: experiments in this realm began in the 1930s immediately following Pluto's discovery. It is a surprise to find this then-unknown planet second in the list of aspect frequencies after Sol. The high frequency of Pluto aspects appearing in the list of goldmaking moments does provide a strange and rather unexpected bridge between the alchemic endeavours of an earlier age and the atomic transmutations of the twentieth century (10,11). Indeed, we may here reflect that, in the Periodic Table of elements, mercury and gold are adjacent, so that a mere single electron distinguishes their atomic structures.
Mercury and Saturn both scored highly, at twice their chance level. On days when the Hermetic Art was being consummated, it seems appropriate that Mercury should score so highly. Mercury was the most often-used metal for the transmutations, on five out of nine occasions, followed by lead.
As the Sun cannot form trines or oppositions to Mercury or Venus, it has a slightly lower expected score. Thereby, major solar aspects are present in this group at at least 150% more than would be expected by chance. The aspects between Sun, Mercury and Saturn were:
The Sun-Mercury-Saturn Aspects
1) SU cnj ME 4«ø, ME cnj SA 1ø
2) SU cnj ME 2ø, SU tri SA 1ø, ME tri SA 3ø
3) SU cnj ME 1ø, SU tri SA 45', ME tri SA «ø
4) SU tri SA 49' R (SU-ME 18ø)
5) SU cnj ME 4ø, ME cnj SA 1ø R
6) - (SU-ME 8ø)
7) SU cnj ME 3ø, SU tri SA 2ø ME tri SA 5ø
8) - (SU-ME10ø)
9) SU cnj ME 3ø 44'
By chance one would expect about three such aspects to be present in such a group, but here there are fifteen! Mercury spends one-eighth of the time within five degrees of the Sun, so the likelihood of finding this conjunction in two-thirds of the charts is remote. Mercury's average angle with the Sun in this group was six degrees, whereas normally it averages eighteen degrees.Two of the goldmaking moments had Mercury moving retrograde, denoted by an 'R' in the Table. The two kinds of solar conjunctions made by Mercury, 'inferior' and 'superior', happen with equal frequency, the former when Mercury passes in front of the Sun and the latter when it is behind. The former is Mercury's closest approach, the only times when it goes retrograde (ie, appears to move backwards against the stars).
The Table shows six conjunction of Sun and Mercury, of which five are superior and only one is inferior (From the previous table, we notice that mercury was not the prima materia in the case of that inferior conjunction). Thus, the goldmaking moments often involved the Sun passing in between Earth and Mercury.
This group comprises all dated, witnessed goldmaking events I found. It would be of interest if more could be located, presumably in non-English language sources (12).
Acknowledgement: I am grateful to Adam McLean for advice in locating some dates.
Taking just the aspects between Sun, Mercury and Saturn gives:
1) SU cnj ME 4«ø, ME cnj SA 1ø 2) SU cnj ME 2ø, SU tri SA 1ø, ME tri SA 3ø 3) SU cnj ME 1ø, SU tri SA 45', ME tri SA «ø 4) SU tri SA 49' (SU-ME 18ø) 5) SU cnj ME 4ø, ME cnj SA 1ø 6) - (SU-ME 8ø) 7) - (SU-ME10ø) 8) SU cnj ME 3ø 44'By chance one would expect two or three such aspects to be present in such a group, but here there are twelve. Mercury spends one-eighth of the time within five degrees of the Sun, so the likelihood of finding this conjunction in five out of eight charts is remote. Mercury's average angle with the Sun in this group was six degrees, whereas normally it averages eighteen degrees.
This group comprises all dated, witnessed goldmaking events in English-language texts that I could find. Solar aspects were indeed strong in this group, but it also showed other distinctive features.